Press "Enter" to skip to content

Zoning and Planning – 2/27/2023 Report

The Zoning & Planning Committee voted to approve the following (see Report and watch the video on NewTV):

  • Appointment of Anne Marie Stein to the Newton Historical Commission

The Zoning & Planning Committee held the following: 

  • Discussion and review relative to the draft Zoning Ordinance pertaining to Mixed-Use, Business Districts, and Village Centers

Jennifer Caira, Deputy Director of Planning; Zachary LeMel, Chief of Long Range Planning; and consultant Tim Love, Principal at Utile Architecture & Planning led the discussion, which focused on the following (described fully in this Planning Memo):

  • Design Standards – Three categories:
    • “Shaping the Building”,
    • “Building Placement’, and
    • ‘’Site Standards”.

Planning Department and Utile are working to incorporate all nondiscretionary design elements into the zoning text. Design guidelines would be revisited in the future to serve as a tool for the Planning Board and City Council when reviewing a project.

  • Mixed-use priority streets: While the MBTA Communities Guidelines do not allow required mixed-use development to be counted, it can be allowed and incentivized.
    • Version 1.0: Mixed-use incentivized in VC# by allowing by-right a max height of 4.5 vs. 2.6 for residential development. The Planning Department working with Utile, is looking at VC2, and proposes identifying mixed-use priority streets where mixed-use would be incentivized or potentially required.
  • Prioritizing historic preservation: Planning and Utile are proposing to remove properties in local historic districts from village center boundaries in response to feedback received. This apparently affects only Newtonville and a single parcel in Upper Falls. They are also looking at incentivizing adaptive reuse in VC2 and VC3 districts. Proposed amendments would provide zoning exemptions for the reuse of pre-1940 buildings (building footprint bonus, exemption from parking, open space, and site plan review).
  • Residential parking requirements for Version 2: Reference was made to a recent study by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC), Perfect Fit Parking Initiative, which examined parking utilization at multi-family developments within various communities.
    • Version 1.0: One parking space per unit parking minimum in residential development. MAPC study proposed 0.5 spaces per unit in residential development, and a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 1 space per unit for residential within 0.25 miles of a transit station, and none for adaptive reuse.
Copyright 2024, Fig City News, Inc. All rights reserved.
"Fig City" and the Fig City News logo are trademarks of Fig City News, Inc.
Privacy Policy